Questioning the Conventional Perceptions of the Mental Health Professional’s Role in
several potential confounding variables in measuring psychological harm of children in
child custody cases. Therefore, it is suspect, even in an exploratory and preliminary study,
to conclude that the evaluations themselves are harmful to the children.
American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers - Child Custody Evaluation Standards, 25 J. Am. Acad.
Matrimonial Law. 251, 294 (2012).
David H. Barlow, Negative Effects of Psychological Treatments: A Perspective, 65 AM. PSYCHOL. SCI.
PUB. INT. 1 (2005).
Higginbotham v. Higginbotham, 857 So.2d 341 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003).
Dr. Ira Daniel Turkat, Harmful Effects of Child-Custody Evaluations on Children, 52 CT. REV. 152 (2016).
Marc J. Ackerman & Tracy B. Pritzel, Child Custody Evaluation Practices: A 20-Year Follow Up, 49 FAM.
CT. REV. 618 (2011).
Robert E. Emery, Randy K. Otto & William T. O’Donoghue, A Critical Assessment of Child Custody
Evaluations: Limited Science and a Flawed System, 6 PSYCHOL. SCI. PUB. INT. 1 (2005).
Sacha M. Coupet, The AAML Child Custody Evaluation Standards: Bridging Two Worlds, 25 J. AM. ACAD.
MATRIMONIAL L. 295, 310 (2012).